A Tale of Two Games and Referees

Last night I watched the San Jose-Detroit game, easily won by the Wings, 4-1.  During the first period, with Detroit up 2-0, the Sharks pressed hard and put the puck behind Ty Conklin.  Referee Dave Jackson, a official since 1990, confidently awarded the Shaks a goal.  He waved his arm so hard at the net that I thought he might hurt himself.  As you can guess, the usual stuff then happened; they went upstairs for video review and the call to Toronto.  Video highlights of the game here.

I watched the replays and listened to the commentary of Ken Daniels and Mickey Redmond, the Red Wings TV broadcast crew.  They too, watched the replays and Mickey said that it didn’t look to him that the whole puck crossed the goal line, but it might not be conclusive video evidence to overturn the call.  But I heard either Ken or Mickey say that Dave Jackson was pretty confident with his call and it would be up to him to change his mind.  Both broadcasters said this with full respect for Jackson.

And then I thought back to another game, back in January, New Jersey against Columbus.  The Jackets lost that game under very similar circumstances.  A puck was put in the net, but video reviews showed that the net was off and that goalie Steve Mason actually had the puck frozen, but the referee at that game, Don Koharski, did not stop play.  And right here, I want to quote myself:

You could still tell Koharski to make his own call, but you could ask him to explain what he saw at that time when making his call.  If says he saw the puck go over the line, you might want to say, “But Don, even though the puck crossed the line, our video shows that the net was off the posts then and the play should have been blown dead.”  Or you could say, “Don, our video clearly shows that the puck was trapped long enough by Steve Mason and you should have stopped play before the puck was put into the net.  Are you sure you want to stand by your call?”

I think last night, the War Room may have done just that.  They watched the video a few times and said to Dave Jackson, “Dave, I know you thought you saw the whole puck cross the line, but our video does not conclusively show that.  Are you sure you want to stand by your call?”  And Dave Jackson, who did not see the video, probably asked them some questions about video angles, puck movement, etc, but in the end, he made the wise decision to take his call back!

I don’t know Dave Jackson, have never met him, but my respect for him just went up.  Maybe the decision to disallow the goal was not his, but unlike another official who awarded a goal to New Jersey in January, he did not stamp his feet or hold his ground until he got his way.  Or possibly the NHL changed the process a little and did advise the official that it could not back up his on-ice decision.  I wish there was a transcript of the review process available.  It appears that logic and reason prevailed.

Whatever happened, the proper call was made.  San Jose didn’t say a word of protest and went back to playing the game.  Thank you NHL.

Advertisements

4 responses to “A Tale of Two Games and Referees

  1. Shark Sandwich

    Your respect for Dave Jackson may have gone up, but thousands of Shark fans would like to kick his sorry butt. How do you offer support to a clown that emphatically waved his arm for a goal, no doubt atl all, then backs down with his tail between his legs when given an out by the war room? Or whatever actually happened because we never got a good explanation of the reversal. Honestly that’s as weak as it gets. Was he overruled, and if so, where was the ‘conclusive’ evidence? Or did he chicken out like a little girl because he was afraid of the Detroit fans’ reaction? That was a huge momentum kill at a critical point of the game, with SJ scoring just 18 seconds after Detroit. I hope we never see this clown again, especially if the RW and Sharks meet in the playoffs.

  2. Don’t talk to me about decisions being overturned or changed. The Jackets have had three victories taken away from them by either the on-ice crew or Toronto.

    In your game last night, I didn’t watch the Sharks feed. The Detroit feed only showed a couple of views and they were “inconclusive” as they say.

  3. Shark Sandwich

    Truth Serum – I don’t know if you’re the author of this blog or not, but it makes no sense. Calls are NOT SUPPOSED TO BE REVERSED unless there is conclusive evidence to support reversal. Suppose they tell this clown referee that the goal can’t be confirmed or overruled, why would he change his call??? Check the video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-bowNXZ4u4 and go to about 1:05 into the vid. He motions 12 flippin’ times that’s it in the goal. He’s standing in perfect position to see it. Why would he reverse his own call?

  4. Mr. Sandwich, I know calls are not supposed to be reversed. I wrote an earlier piece about when the Jackets had a goal taken away from them in a similar situation. The game was in October against the Wild. In that game, the on-ice crew reversed the call of the official who called the goal. The Jackets lost that game. Your team was victimized, too.

    I have written that the entire review process needs to be examined and changes need to take place.

    Yes, I am the author of this blog. Due to economic conditions, I had to let go of the rest of the staff.

    Thanks for stopping by and commenting. Good luck with the Sharks. Jody Shelley is still a favorite here in Columbus and I have a man-crush on Joe Thorton and Rob Blake.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s